No SOPA: Speakers Downplay Legislation at House Online Piracy Hearing

At a House subcommittee hearing Tuesday to discuss online piracy, speakers emphasized education and voluntary cooperation over legislation, even as they acknowledged that voluntary efforts by search engines–a chief gateway to pirated works–had not been effective. John Eggerton of Broadcasting and Cable reports:

John McCoskey, executive VP and CTO of the Motion Picture Association of America, said repeatedly that piracy continued to be a an evolving challenge, but also said that continuing to work and talk with all stakeholders in the ecosystem, rather than legislation, was the best way to address the problem. He pointed to the ISP-backed Copyright Alerting System, which provides a series of escalating warnings to surfers when they are accessing illegal content.

Subcommittee Chairman Howard Coble (R-N.C.) asked what was the best way to encourage folks to use legal content sites. McCoskey said it is not just creating those legal paths, but getting consumers to find them. In the past, that might have been an invitation to MPAA to lay into search engines given a recent study showing that search engines are a critical link between would-be infringers and pirate TV and movies sites, that was not the case.

Asked by one legislator about the problem of pirate sites showing up at the top of search engine results, McCoskey gave them the benefit of the doubt, making the point that the bad actors were not the search engines but the pirate sites. Without mentioning names, he did make the point that one search engine (Google’s) efforts to modify its algorithm to demote those rogue sites had not produced the desired result, but he did not lay blame.

Eggerton said there was “nary a peep” about  SOPA or PIPA, proposed anti-piracy legislation that collapsed after fierce opposition in January 2012.

Tuesday’s hearing by the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet is part of the Judiciary Committee’s promised comprehensive review of US. copyright law. More hearings are scheduled over the next several months.

To underscore the need for strong intellectual property rights protections, a coalition of trade groups released a study Tuesday ahead of the subcommittee meeting showing the economic contribution of “copyright industries,” The Los Angeles Times reported. According to The International Intellectual Property Alliance, the industries contributed more than $1 trillion to the nation’s economy, accounting for 6.5% of GDP, in 2012.

Comments: more
  • http://www.rowenachery.com rowenacherry

    Questionable that: “the bad actors were not the search engines but the pirate sites.”

    The search engines encourage the creation of pirate sites by making pirate sites profitable.
    If the search engines were barred by law from also placing paid advertisements on pirate sites and thereby profiting from piracy and making piracy profitable, the search engines might escape blame.

  • http://www.rowenachery.com rowenacherry

    The Copyright Alliance shared with me a request sent out by the Subcommittee. It was a request for only “positive” testimony. That skews the entire process.

    • DeborahAnne MacGillivray

      How can someone be positive when they are stolen from day in day out? I have already spoken to you about Dawn Thompson, where she was literally choosing between food, medicine and rent, just to survive, while her books were being pirates on dozens and dozens of sites, and often to the tune of 4000-10,000 downloads each. The lack of money for food and medicine contributed to her death. Sorry, I don’t see anything positive in that.

      I cannot even speak to my congressman about this issues because he lifts parts of his speeches from Wikipedia and sees nothing wrong with that.

      Education is the answer coming from big money part of the film industries…well, that is fine for them. They can afford the losses. It’s the grassroots people who will be pushed into choices like Dawn had to make in order to survive.

      Having big Hollywood be the spokesperson for all copyright issues, when they lack any understanding of the problems outside of their world, is like allowing a billionaire to speak to why there is no need for a minimum wage.

    • DeborahAnne MacGillivray

      Hey, I take that back — I can be positive!! I am POSITIVE they are stealing from me left and right!!! ;-)

  • http://www.rowenachery.com rowenacherry

    I fear that “Big Hollywood” may be taken as the spokesperson for all copyright owners and content creators. While education is important, it is too little, too late, and unlikely to change the hearts and minds of a generation that has been taught by Google and Amazon and EBay that content should be free, and that if they buy the hardware and the “freedom-protecting” software, they have the right to do as they please with the music and stories and images.